Plagiarized.com - The Instructors Guide To Internet Plagiarism

Just a few of the problems with Essay #1

Looks like it was written by someone from Ontario. If you're not in Ontario - this paper is automatically suspect.
Cited research is old.
Corrupted text throughout the essay from repeated online transfers.. They look like this: "...individual most appropriate to fulfill both their own and their child's needs"

Just a few of the problems with Essay #2

There are no footnotes or bibliography.
Definitely written by an American... If you're not in the USA, then this paper is automatically suspect.
Names several members of government who are no longer in government.

Just a few of the problems with Essay #3

The title is too simple (not a sure sign, but still)
There are no footnotes or bibliography.
AIDS research, both medical and sociological is very active, yet the latest cited study is from 1986. There is however a note about the film "Philadelphia" which is more recent.

Of the three, Essay #3 would be the most difficult to detect. Remember, we're really not dealing with quality of work here (although all three are sub-standard by any measure), we're looking for key indications (use the Dead Giveaways link in the main window). Essay number three doesn't deal with verifiable information in the present, it does not deal with actual (named) legislation or government issues, it doesn't even give away its country of origin. By this measure it would also be suspect. If a paper is so generic that nothing current is mentioned, it may have been pre-edited for easy transfer between students.